Under the EU AI Act, what is a requirement regarding human oversight?

The requirement for human oversight under the EU AI Act emphasizes the necessity for individuals to have the ability to intervene in high-risk AI applications. This principle acknowledges that while AI systems can be highly sophisticated and capable of making decisions, human judgment and accountability are essential in scenarios where the outcomes can significantly impact individuals or society at large.

Allowing for human intervention ensures that there is a safeguard against potential errors or biases that AI systems may present. It aligns with the broader goals of promoting safety, transparency, and ethical standards in the deployment of AI, particularly in sectors that pose risks to rights and freedoms.

In contrast, the other options do not accurately reflect the intent of the EU AI Act regarding human oversight. Mandatory technical training focuses on equipping individuals with the necessary skills to work with AI, rather than directly addressing oversight. Public reporting of AI decisions pertains to transparency and accountability but does not inherently ensure oversight. Full automation of systems contradicts the principle of human oversight as it removes the option for human intervention entirely.