Which of the following is an initiative to reform tort law in the U.S.?

The initiative that aligns with reforming tort law in the U.S. is the inclusion of assignment rights in model evolutions. This approach focuses on how rights and responsibilities can be transferred or assigned in the context of evolving technology, particularly in the realm of artificial intelligence and its applications. By establishing clear guidelines on assignment rights, it addresses how liability may be managed as models and technologies advance. This is essential in navigating the complexities of who can be held accountable in cases of misuse or failure of AI systems, thus paving the way for important clarifications in tort law.

The other choices do not specifically target the reform of tort law. Designating model components as public information pertains to transparency rather than liability issues. Eliminating liability and indemnification would essentially remove accountability, which does not promote reform but suggests a retreat from responsibility. Establishing universal usage rights for AI focuses more on access and consent rather than the legal qualifications of responsibility within the tort framework. Thus, including assignment rights helps in addressing and reforming the nuanced areas of liability within tort law as it applies to evolving technologies.